Archive for April, 2010

This would be more eloquent if I understood grammar

Poking away through a new book. I can’t help but feel it would be going faster if it wasn’t written in the present tense.

I am not sure I approve of a novel written in the present tense. It seems wrong.

I also can’t help but feel that by the end of the novel, there had better ba damn good reason to excuse something being written in the present tense (with this author, I am sure there will be).

There’s just something about the present tense that makes it difficult for me to feel engaged with the text and I don’t understand why that is.

Better than the Holocaust, anyway

This novel is quite satiric, so the story of an author who is labouring endlessly on a novel that just gets longer and longer despite his best attempts to bring it to a conclusion, isn’t painful, even though it hits uncomfortably close to home.

So, for that matter, does the interwoven (I’m not sure, I’m not actually far enough to see how this is going to tie together and play out) story of the confused, suicidally depressed writing student fascinated by the tawdry Golden Age of Hollywood who the protagonist recognizes as talented but can’t find anyone, in or out of class, who actually likes and wants to read what he writes.

At least they’re productive.

I curse your genius, sir

I have begun to brave the realm of non-genre literature of late and, after reading a novel which has soundly cemented itself as one of my most favourite novels, I have added this rather young, post-modern writer to my ‘list’ of authors to purchase when circumstances allow.

I gave his first novel a try one weekend and tried not to dwell too much on the fact that it was written when he was younger than I am now (this was not very successful).

Can you call something a coming of age tale when the character is already an adult and, in the end, seems to have come to an understanding about life but may not be a bigger or better man for it? Or when his decisions, even his better ones, result in the loss of things which have always been, and clearly are, important? And were there hipsters in the ’80s? I can answer none of these questions, although I’m assured that the answer to the last one is ‘no’.

This first novel is worlds different, in tone and quality, from the later masterpiece that I’d already read, but it’s also worlds better than most first novels I’ve read, and indeed avoids the pitfalls I associate with first novel syndrome. It touches on themes that I suspect are important to the author – sexuality, self-discovery (for good and for ill), and Jewishness (this last may not be a theme, but Jewish protagonists and Jewish characters in general seem important).

Apparently it was made into a terrible movie; just reading the Wikipedia article made me angry, made me baffled as to why you would bother adapting a novel if you were going to completely remove and reconfigure one of the central conflicts (the protagonist torn between his love for a beautifully quirky girl and his attraction to a fabulous, witty gay friend somehow becomes two men in a love triangle for one amazing woman) and God I hate Hollywood and modern filmmaking sometimes.

On the plus side, the worst part about the novel was learning about the awful film adaptation, and the novel itself contained zero Nazis or World Wars, which I have found my reading over saturated with as of late.

Breaking the rules

Will this be more successful than the silent method? Who can say.

After some difficulty I located Enchanter Glass, the most recent novel by Diana Wynne Jones.

Diana Wynne Jones is one of my favourite authors, despite the fact that I think her last great novel was the adult-oriented Deep Secret. Her novels since have been decent, more imaginative and lively than others in her field, but far from the instant classics of some of her earlier works. Enchanted Glass is not a return to form — expecting this of an author recently diagnosed and operated on for lung cancer is beyond absurd. But the book is delightful, a breath of fresh, imaginative air after a near decade of sequels (except for the novella The Game, with which I had problems that I don’t think I should go into at this juncture). I read it in two nights.

Like many of Jones’ classics, Enchanted Glass is set in a world very recognizable to our own, with aspects which are not so much differences as additions. Her trademark of magic in mundanity is represented in full force (a grumpy gardener who has a gift for growing truly enormous produce for the sole purpose of triumphing in the village exhibition, a young woman with a knack for horses who can vaguely divine the future by reading the results of races in the paper, and so on). The favourite theme of duality is here, more blatantly and strongly than in any work since A Sudden Wild Magic. It is utterly English, from the setting to the mythos Jones draws upon as the novel progresses, and very modern (to a point where it’s almost startlingly – being so used to her contemporary fantasies having been written in the ’80s, it is a bit of a shock to find computers and cell phones about the place).

What is definitely the bulk of Jones’ work is that the first character we meet, almost definitely the main character, is not just an adult, but one who is middle-aged, a university history professor. Later a pre-teen boy, who has recently lost the grandmother who raised him, appears, on the run from a combination of social services and dangerous magical forces, but the book is as much about him as it is the professor. This is so unusual, so noteworthy and against genre conventions, that I have to wonder if Jones originally intended, or hoped, for this to be an adult novel, and changed her mind, or was talked back into the safety, and possibly the greater profitability, or her traditional market. Some of the material is dark, or shades to it, and while Jones has never shied away from dark material, that coupled with the adult protagonist makes me wonder.

Here as well, more so than in some of Jones’ recent works, is a feeling of something /more/. Jones often leaves loose ends and doesn’t neatly tie up her plot into a convenient package, but here it is more noticeable than usual. It’s odd and one of the few blemishes in an otherwise outstanding little novel. I enjoyed reading it and I think it is better than Jones has written in years, but I am still left with a sense of something off, a novel that was detoured away from the author’s original intentions, or ended more abruptly than Jones may have planned.

I haven’t actually seen any responses to Enchanted Glass; I think the American market is getting it several months after those of us in the Commonwealth, and it could be, quite possibly (and sadly) that in the absence of a tie to her well-recognized Chrestomanci and Castle series, the little book will be easily overlooked.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.